U.S. Climate Bill Fails to Deliver Needed Pollution Reductions
Statement of Erik Magnuson
Program Associate
Environment Arizona
We
commend U.S. Senator Bingaman for working to build support for action
on global warming. Unfortunately, his new bill fails to deliver the
pollution reductions science shows are needed in the next 10 years to
stave off the most dangerous impacts of global warming for future
generations.
Senator Bingaman’s weak pollution-reduction
targets fly in the face of the sobering conclusions reached by the U.N.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and leading U.S. scientists
about how to prevent the worst impacts of global warming from becoming
unstoppable. (See below for resources on the science.)
To
prevent dangerous global warming, the United States must halt increases
in global warming emissions now, cut emissions by at least 15 to 20
percent by 2020, and slash emissions by at least 80 percent by 2050.
The rest of the world must act as well.
The science demands
ambitious goals, and meeting these goals won’t be easy. But they are
the minimum acceptable response to the threat posed by global warming.
To protect our environment, our economy, and future generations, we
can’t settle for less.
###
Science Resources
-To
limit the rise in global average temperatures to about another 2
degrees F – the rough threshold beyond which dangerous impacts from
global warming become unstoppable – the IPCC concluded earlier this
year that global emissions must peak no later than 2015 and decline by
50 to 85 percent below 2000 levels by 2050 (emphasis added). (IPCC,
2007).
-NASA climate scientist James Hansen, who first warned
Congress of the potential impacts of global warming in the 1980s, has
argued that the earth’s climate is nearing a crucial “tipping point”
that, if passed, would lead to “practically a different planet.” “We
have at most ten years – not ten years to decide upon action, but ten
years to alter fundamentally the trajectory of global greenhouse
emissions.” (Hansen, 2006)